![]() This has to be done on a fresh installation of Windows OS though, so you need to think about whether its really worth it all for an rgb software. Outside of PCMark productivity, we also did not notice much of a dip going from 22H2 to 23H2 and hence, the recent reports about performance loss are most likely limited to buggy Defender.Ĭheck out our other benchmark coverage of Clean installed Windows 10 22H2 vs Windows 11 23H2 benchmarked for performance, Windows 10 clean install vs Windows 11 in-place upgrade and our Intel Core i5-14600K and i9-14900K review.Īs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.Hi, my build is amd cpu, rog crosshair dark hero, rx 5700 xt 64gb ram and ive encountered this problem recently, and found a possible solution. You might be wondering why we didn't mention the PCMark 10 productivity suite and that's because we are considering this benchmark as an outlier similar to what we found in the previous Windows 11 vs 10 comparison where the Rendering and Visualisation numbers heavily favored one over the other. Microsoft could claim some performance gains with this update and they would not be lying. So what have we proven here? Well, we can see that 23H2 really is a worthwhile update, as it bests 22H2 in 17 of the 24 data points tested versus just seven victories for 22H2. Here 23H2 edges out 22H2 in both Compression and Decompression tests, but the differences are once again within the margin of error. We also ran the default 32MB 7-Zip benchmark which measures in GIPS (billion instructions per second). This falls in line with PCMark 10's Digital suite, which means you wouldn't really feel the difference in a blind test. In the Digital Content Creation, they trade blows with 23H2 taking the win in Rendering and Visualisation while 22H2 emerges victorious in Photo Editing.įinally, in the Essentials benchmark which considers app startup, web browsing and video conferencing, the two versions of Windows are quite close to one another with 23H2 winning two out of the three tests, though by very small margins.Ģ3H2 beat out 22H2, though, by only 14 points in the Cinebench 2024 CPU benchmark. Going from 22H2 to 23H2, we see a 15.24% drop in the spreadsheet processing test and a 7.57% drop in the case of writing. And the difference is quite astounding, to put it mildly. The PCMark 10 benchmark suite, performance is a mixed bag with 22H2 coming out on top overall in six of the eleven tests, but specifically in the productivity benchmark. The highest scores were used after running the benchmark three times. In the CPU Profile test, which tries to gauge how good the scaling is across CPU threads, 23H2 once again takes the crown, besting 22H2 at every stage except for the single thread however, it is completely within the margin of error with a difference of only 3 points. Hence the gap is not really as significant as in Time Spy. In Fire Strike Extreme, which is DirectX 11, the gap narrows in Physics to just 82 points, and 134 in the overall score with 23H2 again proving to be better than its predecessor (best score after three runs). In terms of percentages, those are 4.4% and 2% better respectively. For CPU score, 23H2 has a 958 point lead, and an impressive 427 point gap in the overall score, which combines GPU as well as the CPU score. In 3DMark, supplied to us by UL Benchmarks, it's clear to see that 23H2 does a better job overall in the Time Spy benchmark (DirectX 12), that was allowed to run three times, with the best score used. ![]() The ambient room temperature while testing was measured to be between 19C (66.2 ☏) and 20C (68 ☏), and our test rig was open plan. The same hardware was clean installed and updated to build 22631.2715 (KB5032190) and Nvidia driver 545.92 was used, which at the time of testing, was the latest. On both systems, ASUS Armoury Crate was allowed to install all the drivers that our system needed.ĭata used below is from when Windows 11 Pro was clean installed for the Intel 14th gen CPU review, 22H2 was updated to Build 22621.2468 (Moment 4) and Nvidia driver 538.58 was used, which was the latest at that time. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |